Group 3 A2 2016/2017
Wednesday, 28 December 2016
Sunday, 18 December 2016
Evaluation - Question 4 (David McConnell)
How did you use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
https://prezi.com/qisaphvuazrp/present/?auth_key=of4adjd&follow=9btcvllwjlr0
(Use link if embed presentation isn't working)
Have the sound turned on
https://prezi.com/qisaphvuazrp/present/?auth_key=of4adjd&follow=9btcvllwjlr0
(Use link if embed presentation isn't working)
Have the sound turned on
Evaluation - Question 4 (James Presland)
How did you use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
Construction In terms of the production process, My group and I used the Canon DSLR E05 650D camera and the Nikon D7000 DSLR to film footage for the music video and to also take stills for the Digipak.
Using these two cameras allowed me to immerse in the role as a director and cinematographer. The 4k capability of the Nikon D7000 allowed me to capture high-resolution stills and film, however, unfortunately, we could not upload any video to youtube in 4k quality. I explored the construction of each frame while filming. I experimented with the use of positioning of different shots.
While we were filming and creating this camera my group and I made sure to keep in mind what our aim and intention for this project was to create a convincing and realistic media text. By experimenting and exploring different filming and editing techniques, I strengthened the cinematography and overall look of my media text by transforming my scenes into more stylish and professional scenes.

We were already fairly familiar with the Canon DSLR EOS 650D as we used this for our preliminary tasks in both year 13 and 12 and also my group's thriller trailer in year 12. We could also use this camera to gain a second angle shot along with the Nikon D7000. This also provided us with another SD card which we could use as a backup filming camera.
However, one disadvantage of using the Canon DLSR EOS 650D is that the battery life was fairly weak and needed to have a spare battery carried around with it when we went on filming sessions. This meant that we had to choose when to film specific shots instead filming rough cuts and rehearsal shots. The other issue with this camera was the fact that the Quality of the picture was not as good as the Nikon D7000.
In terms of pre-production research and post-production editing, My group and I used a wide range of websites and software such as Blogger, Final Cut Pro, Adobe Photoshop, iMac computers, Youtube.
Blogger

Youtube

However, when uploading content to Youtube and viewing large content files the website can temporarily crash and take an extended period of time to load the video and buffer.
Prezi

iMac Computers

Adobe Photoshop

Photoshop also enabled us to position and crop our still images in order to form our Digipak.
Final Cut Pro

During the Preliminary 'Budget Britney' task we learnt how to silence and remove the audio from the footage used and replace and synchronise it with the audio from the actual song that we were creating a music video for, we did this in order to create synergy within the video and also because most Pop song videos have the artist lip singing. However, due to poor lip singing, we were unable to exactly synchronise both the audio and visuals, this was also heard in feedback.

While experimenting with music video conventions during our preliminary task we used a green screen and edited the footage using chroma key on Final Cut Pro. However, we found that during the storyboarding of the music video we did not need to use a green screen as it would not fit the style of music and our location for filming was accessible for us. However, we did add effects such as birds singing and the rustling of leaves as it offered a feeling of verisimilitude near to the end. We also learnt how to edit the visual to the music, this involves making jump cuts during climaxes in the music and matching the mellow and sombre mood of the music with the calm visuals.
Problems we encountered
Problem 1: The lights we were using to shoot the actor by the river were too bright and could be seen on the actor's clothes. We found a solution to this by adding a light filter to make the light less powerful and bright. This light then acted as a backlight in our three key lighting.
Problem 2: A large part of our footage of the protagonist walking through central London was not filmed on a camera dolly so it made the footage shaky and unpleasant to view. In order to solve this we used the stabilisation tool on Final Cut Pro, this tool goes frame by frame through a selected clip of video and realigns the image to make the visuals easier to view.
Problem 3: Some of the clips placed at the start of the music video were not aligning with the music in time and this meant the whole music video and lip singing was out of time. We solved this by cropping clips into smaller sections, this lead to more flexibility in where I could place the clips and changed the flow of the video.
Evaluation - Question 4 (Osbert Menezes)
How did you use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
Evaluation - Question 4 (Kyle Quadra)
How did you use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
Saturday, 17 December 2016
Friday, 16 December 2016
Evaluation - Question 2 (David McConnell)
How effective is your combination of your main product and ancillary texts?
All three products contain the same image of the protagonist walking through St James' Park. This scene was used as it shows how the protagonist is going on a journey, as he remembers his date. In the digipak and advert it is identical, while in the music video, there is the scene from where we got the image from. We did this to create continuity between the three products, and it was effective as we received lots of feedback that people liked it, it was 'unique' and was very effective.
When picking a font, we knew that it would have to work on a black background as we had decided where we were going to place it in the music video. Therefore we chose a simple, clean white font that stood out against the backdrop. This type of font is very popular with many YouTube vloggers as it can be easily read on a small screen, such as an iPhone. Using the same font throughout all 3 products meant we had another synergistic link. We decided to have the artist's name in a smaller font size as we felt the song is the important element we are trying to sell, not the artist.
In all 3 products, we used the same actor to play the protagonist. This was done as he plays a key role in the music video and so if someone had seen the video on the internet, and then while out in town had seen the advert or the digipak, could make a clear connection and investigate further. Having our protagonist wear smart yet casual clothes would create a character that the majority of teens today, the largest age group that listen to indie music, can relate to.
Other examples
Arctic Monkeys - 'AM'
Our 3 products are the...
- Promotional Music Video
- Digipak
- Magazine advert
I believe we were successful in creating 3 products that effectively combined to create a promotional package for the release of the album/song. This is because all 3 are similar and yet work at an individual level. Moreover, when putting all 3 together, there are clear connections between them. This was because we listened closely to audience research and made sure that all 3 have synergistic links.
The synergistic links
- The image
![]() |
Music video screenshot |
![]() |
The outer cover for the digipak |
![]() |
The poster |
All three products contain the same image of the protagonist walking through St James' Park. This scene was used as it shows how the protagonist is going on a journey, as he remembers his date. In the digipak and advert it is identical, while in the music video, there is the scene from where we got the image from. We did this to create continuity between the three products, and it was effective as we received lots of feedback that people liked it, it was 'unique' and was very effective.
- The text
![]() |
The opening shot from the music video |
The text on the front cover |
The text on the poster |
When picking a font, we knew that it would have to work on a black background as we had decided where we were going to place it in the music video. Therefore we chose a simple, clean white font that stood out against the backdrop. This type of font is very popular with many YouTube vloggers as it can be easily read on a small screen, such as an iPhone. Using the same font throughout all 3 products meant we had another synergistic link. We decided to have the artist's name in a smaller font size as we felt the song is the important element we are trying to sell, not the artist.
- The actor
Our protagonist |
In all 3 products, we used the same actor to play the protagonist. This was done as he plays a key role in the music video and so if someone had seen the video on the internet, and then while out in town had seen the advert or the digipak, could make a clear connection and investigate further. Having our protagonist wear smart yet casual clothes would create a character that the majority of teens today, the largest age group that listen to indie music, can relate to.
- Other factors
- We used the same colour scheme as we didn't want to edit a raw date. The story is meant to be very realistic and having scenes that are too heavily edited would ruin this illusion. Therefore we stuck with the grey skyline and the dull colours, like the grey the protagonist is wearing.
- The simple editing mirrors the simpleness of the indie genre and how lots of the songs are just a singer and a guitar. An audience would see the simple digipak and cover, and if they were a fan of the indie genre, would pick up the song.
Other examples
Adele - '21'
![]() |
Digipak |
![]() |
Advert |
Arctic Monkeys - 'AM'
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)